• Sackbut@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Socialism is just democracy extended into the workplace. Saying pure socialism won’t work is arguing against democracy.

    • Lucidlethargy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I will always argue against pure democracies. People are not invested enough to provide a coherent opinion on 100% of the solutions our societies require for survive and thrive.

      A vote over the use of chemicals for water treatment could easily end in their permanent ban. Hell, with the right malicious intent, someone could easily get dihydrogen monoxide banned from crop fields.

      A pure democracy is how Idiocracy becomes a reality. Now, a mix, such as a republic electing the careful use of democratic socialism… Sure!

      • Sackbut@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That isn’t how it works. It’s like if you’re a part of a cooperatively run business, then you get equal say in workplace practices. There isn’t a ‘boss’ dictating the rules to you.

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Socialism is authoritarian. There’s no democracy in socialism.

      • Sackbut@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The definition of socialism is workers owning the means of production. That means democracy in the workplace. Worker’s councils. Equal representation. Majoritarian politics.