• pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 天前

    funny how it’s not “intelligent” enough to say “hey I don’t really do math” and instead feeds me bullshit that I have to correct and then it’ll say “oh yeah totally right sorry here’s the actual answer that I wouldn’t have given if you hadn’t corrected me as the one who asked the question”

    also your essay fucking sucks. learn to put together a coherent thought instead of relying on a glorified autocorrect that doesn’t have them at all to do it for you.

    • uranibaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 小时前

      funny how it’s not “intelligent” enough to say “hey I don’t really do math”

      From what I understand, that is how OpenAI has decided to make their LLM and not an inherit property of LLMs, but I could you be wrong.

      also your essay fucking sucks

      Did you read it?

      learn to put together a coherent thought instead of relying on a glorified autocorrect that doesn’t have them at all to do it for you.

      I’ll take a guess here. You think I had the LLM write my essey for me. You also think I used it to correct my spelling.
      I already have other software that can help me with my spelling, so that was not needed. I wrote my whole essey first, because actually doing myself is faster and gives a better result than trying to prompt an AI to do it, at least for me.

      What I did do was feed my text into an LLM to see how I could improve the structure of my text, how tense could be used correctly and if any words that I used could be changed for a better substitute. All of those are things that I could do myself, but I had an excellent tool to help me with it so I used it.

      Not using it would be just as stupid as not using a software to correct spelling becuase it might get the spelling wrong.

      I think you do not understand how to get the most out of an LLM or you are using it wrong. Or both.