I mean in defense of the other person. It sounds more like the argument is trying to encourage a bigger action. Like don’t just do your part, vote/participate for what actually changes things in a larger scale.
The very first sentence of the article reads “calculating CO2 emissions” and doesn’t mention or convert to sulfate emissions at all. What are you even talking about?
What I’m doing is pointing out that change has to start with the most damaging factors in our society. I’m not discouraging action, I’m only revealing the scale of the contributors.
The stats linked above are for the sulfate emissions.
What you’re doing is trying to discourage action, and that’s not ok here.
I mean in defense of the other person. It sounds more like the argument is trying to encourage a bigger action. Like don’t just do your part, vote/participate for what actually changes things in a larger scale.
The very first sentence of the article reads “calculating CO2 emissions” and doesn’t mention or convert to sulfate emissions at all. What are you even talking about?
What I’m doing is pointing out that change has to start with the most damaging factors in our society. I’m not discouraging action, I’m only revealing the scale of the contributors.