It’s time for more OpenAI announcement-ware! Today it’s the GPT-4o image generator, which you can now use from ChatGPT! [OpenAI] OpenAI’s fans have been using the bot to redraw photos in the style …
Stuff like this is perfect because it shows how utterly devoid of creativity genAI evangelists are. Great, you recreated a photo that already exists in a drawing style that only has currency because of who you’re stealing it from giving the world something with absolutely no value or meaning. I can’t tell you how excited I am that we’re literally burning the Earth up for this garbage.
Every genAI techbro needs to be sent to the Hague to stand trial for crimes against humanity with how they’ve traded our future for this absolute bullshit. Straight up capital punishment for every one of these fucking losers responsible for cursing us with this garbage. I have zero chill on this issue anymore. They represent the end of humanity.
@BlueMonday1984@dgerard as someone who lacks the skills to draw I’ve found it very helpful in some situations to create images way beyond my ability to create. So it does have uses, but I also know it is limited. So great for making pretty stuff but useless for accurate stuff. It’s just another tool that it takes skill to use at the right times. Sadly it’s being pushed as the answer to many things it is not.
as someone who lacks the skills to draw I’ve found it very helpful in some situations to create images way beyond my ability to create
to
It’s just another tool that it takes skill to use at the right times
in a span of less than a paragraph. C’mon, it’s not a tool that takes skill. It’s a substitute for skill. Knowing when and how it’s appropriate to use AI for art is as much a skill as knowing when to wear a hole-ridden perma-stained Coldplay T-shirt. You could contrive an answer other than “never” but nobody will be impressed either by you doing so or actually wearing the shirt.
@bitofhope there is a big difference between art and generative AI and I’d never claim otherwise (at this stage of development, and likely for a long time). But it is useful, but you need to know the limits. If it’s something professional I’d likely not touch it for many reasons. If it’s something hobby related… I’d give it a go. There is skill in being able to craft good inputs, and knowing what the limitations are of the system being used, and when you really shouldn’t even bother trying.
I’ve already heard of this - mainly thanks to the nuclear backlash it (and basically anything related to AI) is getting. Pulling out a particular highlight, here’s Ashley Lynch tearing the whole thing a new one:
Value, for some, is purely an emotional state.
@BlueMonday1984 @dgerard as someone who lacks the skills to draw I’ve found it very helpful in some situations to create images way beyond my ability to create. So it does have uses, but I also know it is limited. So great for making pretty stuff but useless for accurate stuff. It’s just another tool that it takes skill to use at the right times. Sadly it’s being pushed as the answer to many things it is not.
Going from
to
in a span of less than a paragraph. C’mon, it’s not a tool that takes skill. It’s a substitute for skill. Knowing when and how it’s appropriate to use AI for art is as much a skill as knowing when to wear a hole-ridden perma-stained Coldplay T-shirt. You could contrive an answer other than “never” but nobody will be impressed either by you doing so or actually wearing the shirt.
@bitofhope there is a big difference between art and generative AI and I’d never claim otherwise (at this stage of development, and likely for a long time). But it is useful, but you need to know the limits. If it’s something professional I’d likely not touch it for many reasons. If it’s something hobby related… I’d give it a go. There is skill in being able to craft good inputs, and knowing what the limitations are of the system being used, and when you really shouldn’t even bother trying.