cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/2628014

Charlie Jane Anders discusses KOSA (the Kids Online Safety Act).

If you’re in the US, https://www.stopkosa.com/ makes it easy to contact your Senators and ask them to oppose KOSA.

"A new bill called the Kids Online Safety Act, or KOSA, is sailing towards passage in the Senate with bipartisa>n support. Among other things, this bill would give the attorney general of every state, including red states, the right to sue Internet platforms if they allow any content that is deemed harmful to minors. This clause is so vaguely defined that attorneys general can absolutely claim that queer content violates it — and they don’t even need to win these lawsuits in order to prevail. They might not even need to file a lawsuit, in fact. The mere threat of an expensive, grueling legal battle will be enough to make almost every Internet platform begin to scrub anything related to queer people.

The right wing Heritage Foundation has already stated publicly that the GOP will use this provision to remove any discussions of trans or queer lives from the Internet. They’re salivating over the prospect.

And yep, I did say this bill has bipartisan support. Many Democrats have already signed on as co-sponsors. And President Joe Biden has urged lawmakers to pass this bill in the strongest possible terms."

      • tabarnaski
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not familiar with the US system, but can’t you vote in primaries to have better candidates?

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          In theory, yes. In practice, the 2 main political parties have too much power to allow anyone outside their approval to win.

          • Corkyskog
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            The parties don’t even have to take a vote before nominating a candidate, they don’t even need to hold primaries. In fact Republicans are trying to rewrite the laws/rules/guidelines whatever in a few of their states.

            The former DNC chair has said something to the effect that she wouldn’t have allowed Sanders to get nominated even if he got the votes.

        • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Honestly no. In 2016 Burnie had momentum and growing support. He won my state’s primary. The media just refused to talk about him, often just flat out ignoring he was a candidate. Instead they pushed Hilary hard.

      • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s really disheartening to see this. But it’s still worth voting, because only if Republicans have power can they use this to remove all evidence of LGBTQ+ people from the internet, and only Republicans want to use it this way.

    • Coreidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Vote for the rich! They always have poor people’s best interests in mind. The solution to our problems is more rich people. Surely they won’t fuck us. Why would they ever do that?