• Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah! As long as you don’t read the Montevideo Convention or ask any international legal scholars, your conception of international law is totally correct!

    • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That has nothing to do with being a state, it’s about south American former colonies gaining recognition from European powers.

      "They agreed among themselves to criteria that made it easier for other dependent states with limited sovereignty to gain international recognition. "

      • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        As a restatement of customary international law, the Montevideo Convention merely codified existing legal norms and its principles and therefore does not apply merely to the signatories, but to all subjects of international law as a whole.

        It has nothing to do with being a state, except for being a restatement and codification of the internationally recognized state practice and opinio juris about what constitutes a state.

        Maybe actually read the whole Wikipedia article you’re quoting from instead of just skimming the first few paragraphs.