Details are still scant, but…

“I mean, he had a lot of ammunition in that house, and certainly … all of us were strapped, you know, with ammunition, and we were calling for additional ammunition,” Kraus said. “Like I said, we tried to give him every opportunity to come out.”

    …I’ll go way out on a limb and suggest that this could’ve been handled better.

  • hglman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The insane number of cops here is due to the offices wanting to get in on shooting at someone, not any meaningful need to have 75 officers respond.

    • WiggleWag
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anyone who shot their firearm gets paid leave. Hell I’d rush over there, fire my weapon at the houses wall, then duck for the rest of the time.

    • Clent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      What would be a reasonable number?

      Are you expecting them to go 1v1 like it’s a fucking video game?

      • hglman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Less than 75.

        My point is overwhelming the police takes more than a few simultaneous shootouts.