• argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This doesn’t seem particularly useful in the modern day. If you want to win a war today, you do it with highly trained soldiers and highly advanced equipment, not by handing rifles to a bunch of green volunteers or conscripts.

    • Joe@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Plenty of jobs going in the military. If you support the war, support the war

      • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not that many jobs. If fully half of the country supported an act of war, there would be nowhere near enough military jobs for them to fill.

    • parrot-party@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s only because we haven’t actually gone to war in a long time. Showing off our shiny toys in Desert Storm wasn’t a full scale war. Nor have any of our other excursions been. But a fight with China? You bet your ass we’d need a never ending line of barely trained soldiers to keep up with the bloodshed. We can only hope such an event never happens.

      • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        A fight with China would be over within hours, leaving both countries reduced to radioactive craters. We won’t even need soldiers for that, let alone cannon fodder.