• 00@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know the argument for it being socialist but I really dont think its true. Government services arent ‘inherently’ socialist. And its more of an opportunistic mincer than some “diverse organization”.

        • Deceptichum@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Holy fuck what an American take.

          “They don’t discriminate and offer the most basic of living services; it’s the most socialist socialism ever!”

        • Zorque@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s also very hierarchical and autocratic… literally the opposite of what socialism is.

        • 00@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They provide you housing, food, and a job.

          … thats not socialism. Dont get me wrong, im all on favour of everyone getting those things, in fact im a socialist as well. But socialism is about overthrowing relationships, not “getting free stuff”. The “free stuff” (from a capitalist perspective) is a result of overthrown relationships.

          They allow literally any race, religion, socioeconomic or ethnic group to join.

          And what happens to these people? Ask the afghans that were left behind or the victims of rampant rape culture.
          My point is that a meat grinder does meat grinder things. By not discriminating when joining, but not caring from whence the blood flows.

          It is successful at almost everything it does

          Again, Afghanistan (or more generally, citation needed). Also what does this have to do with the topic?

          They are willing to commit exteme acts of violence to protect you and each other.

          Thats like… a bad thing. You do realize this, right? Also, again, how is this relevant for the topic? Socialism isnt some kind of virtue ethics thing.

          If society creates something great (Canadian made night vision optics with thermal outlines or a better rifle design like the Austrian SIG Sauer MCX) it will be shared with by everyone equally.

          Sorry, i dont get your point.

        • _wintermute@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          and does not exist to create profits unless interfered by with politicians.

          Yeah, because there is definitely no group of people becoming absurdly wealthy off of the military industrial complex and invasions of foreign countries with valuable resources /s

          It also exists “to be interefed with by politicians” by its nature.

          This is the dumbest thing I’ve ever read. Thanks.