How would they prove to you that the funding for schools is necessary? What studies do you require? How is the state going to conduct these studies (in your view), in a timely manner that will positively impact this generation?
There is plenty of research showing, e.g., that fewer kids per teacher provides for better education. Studies that show the benefit of school nurses, counselors, and other wellness experts. All of this costs $$$, often way more money than any given community is willing or even able to put up. This is why strong state funding is so important, rather than relying on levies and bonds. Requiring your specific state to prove the value of teachers, special education, etc is quite an ask. Why isn’t the existing research good enough for you?
I’m with you. I’m a conservative who believes we should support families, and that means making public schools a better place for the next generation.
It’s unfortunate that the cost-cutting, austerity driving, regulatory capture enforcing conservatives are in charge of most right-wing parties at the moment. It doesn’t have to be that way.
The current breed of conservative males us all look bad. I fully support regulations that make sense and are effective.
There is an old saying, you have to spend to make money. I agree with that. We just need to make sure it’s sensible spending.
Public schools need to be funded appropriately and teachers need to be accountable for their students test scores. I need these little turds to pay my social security.
That’s an exaggeration. The median price for new construction in 1980 was $64,600. [1] As for existing housing stock, the median home value in 1980 was $47,200. [2] As housing prices are heavily right skewed, the prices of cheap housing is far closer to the median than the price of expensive housing. Based on a cursory overview of some charts, it seems like the bottom 20% of houses are no more that 30% cheaper than the median, putting them in the $30k range.
deleted by creator
How would they prove to you that the funding for schools is necessary? What studies do you require? How is the state going to conduct these studies (in your view), in a timely manner that will positively impact this generation?
There is plenty of research showing, e.g., that fewer kids per teacher provides for better education. Studies that show the benefit of school nurses, counselors, and other wellness experts. All of this costs $$$, often way more money than any given community is willing or even able to put up. This is why strong state funding is so important, rather than relying on levies and bonds. Requiring your specific state to prove the value of teachers, special education, etc is quite an ask. Why isn’t the existing research good enough for you?
deleted by creator
I’m with you. I’m a conservative who believes we should support families, and that means making public schools a better place for the next generation.
It’s unfortunate that the cost-cutting, austerity driving, regulatory capture enforcing conservatives are in charge of most right-wing parties at the moment. It doesn’t have to be that way.
The current breed of conservative males us all look bad. I fully support regulations that make sense and are effective. There is an old saying, you have to spend to make money. I agree with that. We just need to make sure it’s sensible spending. Public schools need to be funded appropriately and teachers need to be accountable for their students test scores. I need these little turds to pay my social security.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
That’s an exaggeration. The median price for new construction in 1980 was $64,600. [1] As for existing housing stock, the median home value in 1980 was $47,200. [2] As housing prices are heavily right skewed, the prices of cheap housing is far closer to the median than the price of expensive housing. Based on a cursory overview of some charts, it seems like the bottom 20% of houses are no more that 30% cheaper than the median, putting them in the $30k range.
deleted by creator
1975 =/= 1980. Looks like housing went up 64% in those 5 years from the data I already linked.
deleted by creator
Data instead of anecdotes?
deleted by creator