• Corkyskog
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why not edit them to be sterile eventually. Do they really provide a real benefit?

        • Corkyskog
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          A lot of things eat a lot of other things too. The only concern I can think of is being afraid that something worse might somehow fulfill its biological niche.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I think that’s the goal! Mosquitos are already being fought this way where genetically modified males are introduced to the environment who are stronger and faster than the locals but their offsprings are sterile. It’s a wildly effective strategy!

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    Using fluorescent proteins is a first step because it is easy to verify that the transgene is expressed where you want it to be expressed.

    • Blum0108@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t want no trans genes in my spiders! I thought trump was getting rid of DEI!

  • Meursault@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Now if only we could gene-edit article writers to include photos of the thing in question. Where’s the red, fluorescent silk?

  • Wilco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s almost time for Spider Man in real life! Can you see it on the horizon? It will be outlined by the eerie red glow of spiderwebs.

    • whyrat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Exactly what I thought when I first mis-read it as “gene-editing” instead of “gene-edited” and thought Spiderman!

    • StoneyDcrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, what if it bites someone. That could end up causing a mutation in them that gives them spider powers. Like some sort of man-spider that would be a menace to society.

      • kambusha
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        Man-spider, Man-spider, does whatever a man-spider does

    • theUwUhugger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Look I wish we were at the point where we could make unspeakable horrors even if only on accidents, it would make the field I am studying a lot lot lot more fun!

      Gene editing is rllllly not scawy if you look into it, only the same folks rage against it who fear wind turbines and deny global warming

      • can
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Those computers with neurons are hard at work

  • octopus_ink@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I feel like I should be horrified by this. And yet, I think it’s pretty cool.

    Some spooky thoughts about it also there are already glow in a dark domestic flowers

    OMG if we can get glow in the dark spider silk so I can avoid walking through them in the summertime near our garage door that would be great.

  • essell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    So, when this results in a new Spider-Man, he can weave his own outfit?