• Steeve@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Haha what the hell are you talking about, a third of cropland is literally dedicated to growing livestock feed. Livestock also directly contributes 7% of greenhouse gas emissions by shitting alone.

    This is directly from the FAO: https://www.fao.org/3/ar591e/ar591e.pdf

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      a third of cropland is literally dedicated to growing livestock feed

      that’s not what your source says. and all of agriculture is about 20% of our emissions, but i’d be fine if it were 100%: we need to eat.

      • Steeve@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Twenty-six percent of the Planet’s ice-free land is used for livestock grazing and 33 percent of croplands are used for livestock feed production.

        Dude, it’s one of the first things written on the first page. Come on now, this is embarassing.

          • Steeve@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Jesus Christ, so close, read ten more words. Do you think you can do that buddy?

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          33 percent of croplands are used for livestock feed production.

          but not exclusively for livestock feed production. it’s not “dedicated”.

          • Steeve@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This is what this user posted and embarrassingly deleted before writing the comment above:

            grazing lands aren’t croplands

            If you can’t even be bothered to read a full quote that was handed to you, you aren’t discussing in good faith. You can go ahead and fuck off with your hand wavy non-scientific bullshit. Learn to read a source and provide a proper rebuttal with evidence instead of spamming nonsense.

            Edit: Oh look I broke the spambot lol