• regalia@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why wouldn’t you want free speech protection to be regulated to private companies as well

    • Kecessa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Free speech is guaranteed in public space, not private space.

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just because you get to a public park in a privately operated taxi doesn’t mean the park is suddenly private. It would also be absurd for the taxi to have a say in how you spend your time in the park.

        I also refuse to trust that any private corporation would have my best interests at heart, or that they would not use the excuse of policing hate speech to also interfere with discussion against their corporate interests.

        • Kecessa
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you enter the taxi and the driver sees that you’ve got a shirt with a swastika the driver can tell you they’re not taking you for this reason.

        • Ado@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The taxi has a say in how you spend your time in the taxi, however

        • Kecessa
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          When did I say I didn’t want it? Just stating a fact.

            • Kecessa
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because you’re asking a question that’s irrelevant.

              • regalia@literature.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                it’s literally the whole topic of the thread you’re replying to, you just misread it

                • Kecessa
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No, I stated a fact and you’re asking me why I agree with it when I never said I do.

                  • regalia@literature.cafe
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Bro you are dense. I can say water is wet when I’m asked a completely different question, doesn’t change the fact that doesn’t have anything to do with the question asked. I didn’t bring up if free speech is applied to private spaces, that’s an entirely different comment that nobody said, we already know the answer, hence why it wasn’t asked. I asked why you specifically, don’t think that should apply, which is why I asked that. You didn’t read correctly, and was asked three times now and are still avoiding the question for some reason, you either do or don’t support it and you are avoiding stating either which is the whole fucking point of this thread, and now it’s a waste of time because you don’t want to share your opinion for the sake of downvotes?