I found this article by Cato Institute, of all places, interesting as it criticizes the Republican rhetoric about the constitution as possibly…deeply misinformed.
I found this article by Cato Institute, of all places, interesting as it criticizes the Republican rhetoric about the constitution as possibly…deeply misinformed.
I love that throughout this entire piece talking about how the Republican candidates are all either ignorant of, or antagonistic towards certain parts of the constitution, the author never mentions that 6 of them said they’d support Trump as their party’s nominee even if he was convicted of seditious acts.
The entire party is a joke. One long, weird, unfunny joke.
deleted by creator
This feels like a weird, leading question. What part of my original response prompted you to ask it? Or did you just accidentally reply to the wrong person?
deleted by creator
Uh, no? I offered no opinions on that whatsoever. I simply summed up the article by saying:
In this sentence, I’m saying that the author of the article said that. For proof, you can read the article.