Deebster@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agoRule 84, etclemmy.mlimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1314arrow-down13
arrow-up1311arrow-down1imageRule 84, etclemmy.mlDeebster@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-squarerevoopy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up29·1 year agoI argue that when presented with 9 normal looking numbers, the o is not an acceptable alternative to 0
minus-squaremiss_brainfart@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·1 year agoSo many fonts just do whatever to be different and stand out from the crowd, but all it does is making it easier to avoid them
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIt just looks like a lowercase 0. Lowercase digits often look better anyway.
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year agoLook up lowercase digits in your typography manual and be enlightened. And also start making nicer documents.
I argue that when presented with 9 normal looking numbers, the o is not an acceptable alternative to 0
So many fonts just do whatever to be different and stand out from the crowd, but all it does is making it easier to avoid them
It just looks like a lowercase 0. Lowercase digits often look better anyway.
what
Look up lowercase digits in your typography manual and be enlightened. And also start making nicer documents.