The legal ruling against the Internet Archive has come down in favour of the rights of authors.

  • Zacryon@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If we want authors to survive, we’ve got to stop assuming that authors’ intellectual labour is a public commodity.

    Ah yes, because it’s the fault of (internet) libraries and not greedy publishers who try to keep the royalties for their authors as low as possible. /s

    How about looking where this problem starts instead of where it ends?

    • Paradoxvoid@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      If we want authors to survive, we’ve got to stop assuming that authors’ intellectual labour is a public commodity.

      The irony being that this is exactly what copyright was originally intended to facilitate - authors creating works to become public domain within a relatively short period of time.

    • MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are authors starting to publish without a publisher. I think that is the right direction, not making all books free. Maybe once the publishers have less control there will be some copyright reforms to shorten the time it takes to bring works into the public domain. Right now it is 95 years from publishing, but I think the author’s life plus 30 years or something might make a bit more sense. For example, George Orwell has been dead for over 70 years, but his works are still under copyright.

    • ZzyzxRoad@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Especially fucking Wiley. If you’re a student paying hundreds for a textbook with a “supplemental code” that makes it so you can’t buy it used, then it’s probably by fucking Wiley. Fucking greedy cunts.