Ukraine’s National Corruption Prevention Agency added major food corporations PepsiCo and Mars to the “international sponsors of war” list on Sept. 1.

    • hypelightfly@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t see why it would. It’s not like they’re in a position to not buy from wherever they can.

        • hypelightfly@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It doesn’t affect it one way or the other. What does is their continuing operations in Russia, who started and is continuing the war.

              • zephyreks@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Because China (and Mexico, India, Southeast Asia, South America, Africa, and the Middle East) have not really introduced sanctions (except against military equipment)? These companies are following their government’s policy, which is more than can be said for companies like PepsiCo and Mars (both American).

                International trade is dictated by countries, not by companies. If a company is breaking the policy of the country it operates from, that’s obviously very bad. These companies aren’t trying to pick sides: their government hasn’t picked a side and so there is no reason for the company to.

    • DrM@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If you buy a drone for lets say 1000$ from Xiaomi via AliBaba, 100$ of those go to AliBaba maybe 1$ goes to Russia. from the 900$ left for Xiaomi, 600 are gone for the production. 300 left, 3 go to Russia. 4$ for Russia. But if this drone helps invalidate only one russian soldier, that 4$ are easily worth 100000$. If it helps invalidate a tank, it goes to the millions. Thats easily worth it if there is no alternative