Cyclists run the gamut but cycling infrastructure favors the wealthy. This favor is explicit (where agencies choose to create infrastructure, systematically) and implicit (land use follows “the market”, pushing the poor away from infrastructure).
This would not be the case if we fixed the latter by overthrowing the capitalist class - or at leasr scaring the shit out if them.
cycling infrastructure favors the wealthy. This favor is explicit (where agencies choose to create infrastructure, systematically) and implicit (land use follows “the market”, pushing the poor away from infrastructure).
Cyclists run the gamut but cycling infrastructure favors the wealthy. This favor is explicit (where agencies choose to create infrastructure, systematically) and implicit (land use follows “the market”, pushing the poor away from infrastructure).
This would not be the case if we fixed the latter by overthrowing the capitalist class - or at leasr scaring the shit out if them.
how does cycling infrastructure favour the wealthy
It’s built where they live and where they want to go.
ok so you don’t mean the existence of cycling infrastructure favours the wealthy you mean the lack of it disadvantages the poor