“It is a complicated issue. It is truly a complicated issue, with a wide range of views, truly a wide range of views,” Jean-Pierre said. “There is no ‘yes or no’ answer to this, it is complicated. There is a rule that the Department of Education [DOE] has put forward, and we’re going to let that process move forward, and again, we want to make sure that while we establish guardrails with this rule, we also prevent discrimination, as well, against transgender kids. But again, a complicated issue with a wide range of views, and we respect that.”

“Absolutely no reason for the Biden admin to do this,” New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wrote. “It is indefensible and embarrassing. The admin can still walk this back, and they should. It’s a disgrace.”

“Honestly, this move by Biden to push a rule on trans kids in sports is not only a backwards betrayal, it [forces] us to have to spend our time dealing with god d*** sports instead of criminal bans on our healthcare,” Alejandra Caraballo, a civil rights attorney and LGBTQ+ advocate, wrote. “He could have just done nothing. This is legitimizing transphobia.”

The mOsT PrOgReSsIvE Administration in History™ funny-clown-hammer “A complicated issue with a wide range of views, and we respect that” funny-clown-hammer Fuck off out of here with that “centrist” nonsense. There’s nothing complicated about it, and it’s not an issue unless you want to turn it into one and want to appeal to people’s emotions like Republicans are doing. It was only a matter of time before they’d start throwing trans people under the bus. I guess with the coming elections it’s as good a time as ever.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You do know what Congress does, right? The WH is not almighty. Most new laws require congressional approval with 60 votes in the Senate and a majority in the House. Republicans are blocking both.

      • charly4994 [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Strange how all that voting in 2020 did nothing but give Dems a majority that they pissed away. They had opportunity after opportunity to push shit through but somehow got thwarted at every turn. Oh no it’s the Parliamentarian coming in with a steel chair! Oh dear God it’s Sinema and Manchin coming from behind! They could’ve ended the filibuster but never did. Biden could’ve packed the courts but never did. Like at this point what can they do? They’re hobbled by their own masturbatory fantasies of West Wing politicking. In reality it’s a sham. The US was not built to be a democracy, the “Founding Fathers” intentionally tried to obfuscate the voting process to keep it away from the masses. This nation was built on enslavement and genocide and under no circumstances did voting ameliorate their plight. How many wars were waged by indigenous people fighting for their survival as the US continued to break treaties and encroach on their homelands? For some reason the name is not coming to me right now but there was this large civil war fought in the US over slavery that a lot of people like to insist were over states rights. For workers rights the working class paid for it dearly in unmarked graves and terrified screams as workers were locked inside of a burning building. Voting didn’t change any of this, we had to fight for every inch we’ve ever gotten.

      • CombatLiberalism [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Interesting how, according to you and nearly every other lib I’ve talked to, the Democrats are simultaneously the only hope against Republican rule but also powerless to stop Republicans whenever they’re in power. Meanwhile Republicans advance their genocidal policies regardless of which party is in charge, but they’re also so weak that the only thing necessary to stop them in their tracks forever is to vote in a Democrat at the next election.

        The observant among us would see that these are contradictory statements. By analyzing those contradictions and finding which one aligns with reality, you could come to a more coherent viewpoint.

      • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        There have been multiple instances of Dems controlling both congress and the WH over the last 50 years. Where are our abortion rights? Livable wages? Universal healthcare? Why don’t the Dems actually do shit when they have the opportunity to?

        • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Democrats have not had a 60-vote supermajority in the Senate to write those things into law. Abortion rights were stable until Trump appointed three justices. Not the Dems fault.

          • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Abortion rights only existed because of a Supreme Court ruling in 1973, which could have been (and was) overturned by another Supreme Court in the future. Rights decided by SC rulings and not codified into law are not, in fact, stable. The Dems have had multiple opportunities since 1973 to codify abortion rights into law and have failed to do so. Yes, the Dem’s fault.

            And let’s not pretend like the Dems would do anything if they actually had a 60-vote supermajority. They’d find some Manchin or Sinema scapegoat to shoot it down and pin all the blame on.

            • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Let’s be real here. It’s the Republicans’ fault if anything.

              Also, it was different times when Dems had opportunities decades ago. Many Dems were not pro-choice and there has never been a majority within the Democratic Party to pass legislation until recently. It certainly wasn’t a priority since Roe was in place. Now they face a Senate filibuster without 60 votes.

              • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                Let’s be real here. It’s the Republicans’ fault if anything.

                Right, just ignore every argument presented to you, cover your ears, and pretend as though no one disagrees with you.

                there has never been a majority within the Democratic Party to pass legislation until recently

                The Carter administration is recent?

                Now they face a Senate filibuster without 60 votes.

                Dems had the opportunity to get rid of the filibuster, but they didn’t do that, either. How convenient.

                • fox [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The Dems would’ve definitely passed abortion protections into law, but you see the parliamanterian gave them 3 Pinocchio’s so that’s a bust

              • the filibuster is a fake obstacle. dems can get rid of the filibuster at any time. remember the whole “parliamentarian” debacle? yeah that was manufactured too. they could just fire the parliamentarian and find a new one