Vuraniute@thelemmy.club to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agofixed cyberghost's "meme"thelemmy.clubimagemessage-square804fedilinkarrow-up1969arrow-down1146
arrow-up1823arrow-down1imagefixed cyberghost's "meme"thelemmy.clubVuraniute@thelemmy.club to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square804fedilink
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down2·1 year agoWhat makes it morally justifiable in this case but not others?
minus-squareJohnDClaylinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoThat it is benefiting those involved instead of being to their determent.
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down2·1 year agoIs benefiting others morally justifiable?
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down2·1 year agoWhat is the moral justification for your answer?
minus-squareJohnDClaylinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoIt’s actually axiomatic. I can’t really prove or justify why one should be good or bad, or why they should be good or bad to one another. But that good is good and to be strived for is the staring point of the philosophy.
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down2·1 year agoThis is an appeal to the one true scotsman fallacy
minus-squareJohnDClaylinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoLook up axioms. You’ll see they are the staring points of logical arguments.
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·1 year agoWhy do you get to define axioms to exclude my definition?
What makes it morally justifiable in this case but not others?
That it is benefiting those involved instead of being to their determent.
Is benefiting others morally justifiable?
Yes
What is the moral justification for your answer?
It’s actually axiomatic. I can’t really prove or justify why one should be good or bad, or why they should be good or bad to one another. But that good is good and to be strived for is the staring point of the philosophy.
This is an appeal to the one true scotsman fallacy
Look up axioms. You’ll see they are the staring points of logical arguments.
Why do you get to define axioms to exclude my definition?