How is it “my” research when you’re making the claims?
The fact that you can’t answer that question from your Gish Gallop of identical articles speaks volumes. Yes, it’s already well-known that many open CV models with poor training sets have poor performance. No, this has not been demonstrated with the autonomous vehicles coming to market.
The second article has a photo of a Cruise vehicle, but does not actually mention them.
You’re not even reading your own “sources.” If you have zero knowledge about a subject it might be best for you to quietly sit on the sidelines and listen to people who actually know what they’re talking about.
How is it “my” research when you’re making the claims?
The fact that you can’t answer that question from your Gish Gallop of identical articles speaks volumes. Yes, it’s already well-known that many open CV models with poor training sets have poor performance. No, this has not been demonstrated with the autonomous vehicles coming to market.
I answered you’re question. You’re clearly just a fucking idiot and I’m done fucking having a conversation with you. Good luck in life dumb ass.
The second article has a photo of a Cruise vehicle, but does not actually mention them.
You’re not even reading your own “sources.” If you have zero knowledge about a subject it might be best for you to quietly sit on the sidelines and listen to people who actually know what they’re talking about.
“Self-driving cars, like the Cruise model from General Motors pictured above, are already on streets throughout the United States.”
It literally the first fucking thing it says after the title you fucking moron.
Right. Now show me where it says they’re using bad CV models, or only visible light CV and no other way to detect humans.