The controversial construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) gained national and international attention when the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers accepted an application filed by Energy Transfer Partners, a Texas-based developer behind the project.

The position of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe is that the Dakota Access Pipeline violates Article II of the Fort Laramie Treaty, which guarantees the “undisturbed use and occupation” of reservation lands surrounding the proposed location of the pipeline. In 2015 the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, operating as a sovereign nation , passed a resolution regarding the pipeline stating that “the Dakota Access Pipeline poses a serious risk to the very survival of our Tribe and … would destroy valuable cultural resources.”

To generate momentum for their cause and demonstrate their opposition to the pipeline, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe organized runs, horseback rides, and marches. Many Native Nations, along with non-Native allies, celebrities, and several politicians supported the movement and travelled to join DAPL protesters at the Sacred Stone Camp on the Standing Rock Reservation. Conditions at the camp became intense. North Dakota law enforcement officials and private guards hired by Energy Transfer Partners clashed with protestors, sometimes violently, and made hundreds of arrests.

On September 3rd, 2016, the Dakota Access Pipeline company used bulldozers to dig up part of the pipeline route that contained possible Native graves and burial artifacts; the land was subject to a pending legal injunction.

Protesters stormed the land and were attacked by a private security firm, armed with attack dogs and pepper spray.

The battle over the Dakota Access Pipeline, explained vox

Standing Rock and the Dakota Access Pipeline: Native American Perspectives: Background: Historical and Current

Dakota Access Pipeline Company Attacks Native American Protesters with Dogs & Pepper Spray

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

now all fediverse discussion will be considered a current struggle session discussion and all comment about it are subject to be removed and even banning from the comm.

have all of you a good day/night meow-coffee

  • HarryLime [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Oh okay, I guess the parents of the founder of the Black Panthers named their kid after a guy who was worse in terms of segregation than surrounding states for some weird reason.

    His initial gubernatorial campaign uniquely amongst Louisiana politicians tried to both-sides the KKK. He refused to hire black people for any higher positions because then white people would have to use words like “Mister” to refer to them.

    Sorry, but you can’t make the claim that he was “He was literally, and I do mean literally, measurably worse in terms of segregation than surrounding southern states.” and then support it with actions and words that literally any Jim Crow governor, and probably a fair number of non-southern governors, would have done in the 1930s.

    • h3doublehockeysticks [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh okay, I guess the parents of the founder of the Black Panthers named their kid after a guy who was worse in terms of segregation than surrounding states for some weird reason. I guess he won the blac

      Yes. Because our understanding of a lot of things have changed in the intervening 70 years.

      Sorry, but you can’t make the claim that he was “He was literally, and I do mean literally, measurably worse in terms of segregation than surrounding southern states.” and then support it with actions and words that literally any Jim Crow governor, and probably a fair number of non-southern governors, would have done in the 1930s.

      HE RAN AGAINST PEOPLE WHO PUBLICLY CONDEMNED THE KKK. He refused to. He was literally the only guy who publicly did a centrism on the KKK. And I mean measurable, as in statistics. As in the lot of black people improved faster in surrounding states, as in social programs deliberately excluded blacks at a higher rate under his leadership than comparable programs elsewhere.

      Fuck it. https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/4232958

        • h3doublehockeysticks [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          You are defending a segregationist by implying I am ignorant, and when confronted with examples of his racism with an explicit note that it was something he uniquely did you claimed it was just something everyone would do.

          • HarryLime [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I started by asking you

            Where are you getting that from?

            Literally the first thing I asked you because what you were saying contradicts what I’ve heard about Huey Long. Maybe I’m wrong about him, and I’m willing to amend my views if I am! You can’t just expect everyone to come into the world with your same perfect level of understanding on every topic.