The use of depleted uranium munitions has been fiercely debated, with opponents like the International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons saying there are dangerous health risks from ingesting or inhaling depleted uranium dust, including cancers and birth defects.

  • flipht@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not about them. It’s the children who find the spent ammo later.

    This crap is the reason that there are birth defects spikes anywhere the US military operates.

    • kitonthenet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ok but the alternatives are not environmentally conscious either, finally the people who’s land it is should be the ones making choices about the conditions of that land

      • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The alternative bring tungsten? It’s very stable so anything besides eating a spent rod isn’t going to have effects. If it’s in the air it’ll just be inert. Even if it gets in your lungs it’ll be like any other dust. DU on the other hand would keep emitting radiation internally.

      • Square Singer@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        But which people? Government or the people who actually own the land?

        And I guess, their favourite choice of “Don’t use any weapons on my land and just clear off voluntairily” is not an option.

        I don’t get why people hate on the Ukraine for using weapons to defend themselves. Not like they chose to be attacked.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s a really convenient narrative based on the fallacy of homogenizing Ukraine. Let’s take a look at a few slides from this lecture that Mearsheimer gave back in 2015 to get a bit of background on the subject. Mearsheimer is certainly not pro Russian in any sense, and a proponent of US global hegemony. First, here’s the demographic breakdown of Ukraine:

            here’s how the election in 2004 went:

            this is the 2010 election:

            As we can clearly see from the voting patterns in both elections, the country is divided exactly across the current line of conflict. Furthermore, a survey conducted in 2015 further shows that there is a sharp division between people of eastern and western Ukraine on which economic bloc they would rather belong to:

            Maybe learn a bit about the subject first.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Russia is obviously not going to withdraw, and you or me asking Russia to withdraw isn’t going to make it happen. However, people living in western countries do have at least some influence on their own regimes. Of course, the reason western regimes can keep the proxy war going is precisely because a lot of scumbags are cheering it on right now.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                1 year ago

                People of Donbas whom the Ukrainian regime was abusing for the past eight years asked Russia for help to defend their lives and home. The atrocities the Ukrainian regime was committing were even covered by CNN in 2014 https://twitter.com/paulius60/status/1611148483859255296

                Meanwhile, the west is not helping Ukraine, it’s prolonging the war which results in more people dying without changing the outcome. This war could’ve been over last March when Russia and Ukraine almost signed a deal, but UK and US decided to torpedo it. If that’s your idea of helping Ukraine then you need to get your head checked.

        • FireMyth@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol the people of ukraine are fighting against a war of aggression from Russia. That’s it.

    • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is ammo made from lead that much better? I honestly don’t know. Sure the radiation sucks but Uranium, at least the isotope they’re sending is “barely” radioactive. It’s the same Uranium people had in their plates etc. The toxicity is probably the far more relevant factor but I don’t know how Uranium compares to lead.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Depleted uranium is not really that radioactive. Everything is technically radioactive eventually though. Depleted uranium is what’s left behind when you seperate the radioactive stuff out. It’s a heavy metal still, so isn’t good for you, but heavy metals will always be involved. Trying to have a war using only healthy, organic, ethically sourced munitions isn’t going to happen.

    • cooljacob204@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The amount of Ukrainians dying right now will pale in comparison to those effected by the munitions.

      The controversy around depleted uranium rounds is way overblown.

      Even in Iraq the evidence is super inconclusive. And yes birth defects rose however the entire country basically collapsed for years and nothing clearly indicates it was the DU used.

      Don’t get me wrong, it’s nasty stuff. But this is war, more people are getting killed by bombs then any DU related cancer can cause.

        • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          How do you you it’s not linked to any of the other hundreds of dangerous chemicals?

          • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because the issue is specific to the region and started specifically after the tank battle where DU ammunition was used. If it would be a general issue with some dangerous chemical being used, we’d expect to see similiar issues in other regions. Of course it is hypotheticakky possible that at the same time some dangerous and persistant chemical exposure happened in the region, but that is not plausible and also the US would have a strong interest in finding such an alternative explanation. But there isn’t any research published, that provided an alternative.

            Also look into the wording of the US when sending the ammunition to Ukraine. They state that no radiation hazard is to be expected for the Ukrainians. They do not talk about a toxicological hazard.

        • mashbooq@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago
          1. correlation ≠ causation. 2) if the disease is caused by DU, is it due to the radioactivity or the fact that DU is a heavy metal?
          • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            i never said it had to be because of radiation. Even just in its effect as a heavy metal it seems to be much worse. Also it could be that it becomes airborn more easily than other metals such as lead, so the wreckage of tanks shot with DU are more dangerous to the people cleaning them up.

            • mashbooq@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Why are you so worried about speculated harms when Ukrainians are actually being raped, tortured, and murdered by russians? Your lack of humanity is showing

                • severien@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  How about letting Ukrainians make that cost/benefit analysis for their own country? I think they’re grown-ups, no need to patronize.

                  • mycorrhiza they/them@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    it’s not the Ukrainian people who decide, it’s the Ukrainian government that decides, and America basically decides what they decide

                  • slice1@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Are you really this delusional? Sure Ukraine has their own uranium munitions that they can decide to use anytime they want… When does the public get to decide on what happens with the tax money - fund schools, build infrastructure, etc. or send radioactive ammunition to fuel a proxy war in some corrupt country?

                • mashbooq@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Weighing costs and benefits happens with a comprehensive set of actual facts, not a hodgepodge of speculations and fearmongering that play into the fascists’ hands

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This makes sense.

      I imagine there’s a lot more reasons for birth defect spikes post US mil ops in addition to this. The military isn’t exactly an environmentally conscious operation. ☠️

      • flipht@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, burn pits and other crap will help.

        But this kind of ammo, kids will find and hang on to. They bring it home, add it to their collection of other cool shit they’ve scavenged…and then their brothers and sisters are born with malformed limbs, mishaped heads, etc.

        There have been a lot of stories written about it over the years. The one I read was specifically about Iraq I believe, but it was a while ago.