• Kecessa
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    So they would still have a landlord it would be the government instead and people would be pissed when the government increases rent or throws people out because they’re destroying the place or not paying their rent…

    • Croquette
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d much prefer to have social housing than slumlords that want to make a profit on the rented space while also keeping the value of the building.

      • kbotc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        So, how does the government decide who gets beachfront property and who lives behind the power plant?

        • Croquette
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          The same way that it works now? The unit is for rent, you take an appointment and the first person that qualifies get it.

          This is not the gotcha you think it is. What so different than the current system?

            • Croquette
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because the government wouldn’t be trying to bleed every penny out of tenants just because they can.

              • aikixd@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s some alternative reality, you’re talking about. My government does try, and succeeds in bleeding every last penny that I earn.