• bonfire921@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I run a dual monitor on X11 and never understood why people have issues with it? I’m by no means a Linux expert and I do run in Nvidia, I run different refresh rates. Can someone explain it to me?

      • ngoomie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even without considering laptops, I can already imagine quite a few circumstances where someone might want monitors of differing DPIs. I’ve actually thought sometimes of getting a smaller monitor I can have off to the side that I display a browser window containing mostly text on when I’m playing videogames or working in something like Blender or Aseprite; yknow, for referencing a guide, wiki, or manual or something. I don’t even have a super high desire for a multi-monitor setup outside of that.

      • hypertown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I run 2 monitors with different DPIs and X11 works without an issue. Can’t say the same about wayland where scaling still has so many bugs it’s just unusable.

        • You can’t set 2 different DPIs for the monitors on X11. On one monitor everything is just going to be bigger than the other. Depending on the DPI difference it can be basically unusable.

          • lutillian
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can configure software rescaling using xrandr and some scripts… But that can cause a massive amount of jank with anything that requires a degree of pixel accuracy

          • hypertown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Valid point. I forgot about 4K… I run just 125% scale so it doesn’t bother me at all. Well it’s kinda funny that both protocols are broken in that regard.

            • Gamey@feddit.rocks
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I feel like taht’s often the case but Wayland as the newer protocol usually has the correct architecture with a early implementation while X11 has hard to fix architectural problems. I am a opponend of “whatever works for you” and I think that will be Wayland for most people fairly soon if it isn’t already but in case it actually isn’t I wouldn’t recommend it because, well, it doesn’t work properly for you.

    • cmysmiaczxotoy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      x11

      2 monitors 144hz, 1 TV 120hz.

      Nothing on any monitor can render at higher than 120hz

      Play movie on any one screen, other screens can’t render anything at higher than 24fps

      Wayland works fine

    • Freeman@lemmy.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do similar. For laptops and docks, especially if they change setups it can be a pita (though you just need to copy files around).

      Also the DE monitor config (ie that you use to login) is logically different to a users x config. So you gotta copy that over to make sure the primary monitor etc is right.