• Comrade Spood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The community themselves decide. If it’s enough of a problem, the community will organize to address it how they see fit. That’s the whole point of anarchism. We don’t have all the answers and we don’t claim to, the people that run into these issues will find the solutions that best suites their needs.

    • JohnDClay
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      So does the community vote on everything then? If there are too many decisions, could they appoint someone to make some of the decisions on their behalf? Or does every little decision need to be voted on by everyone? If not, I don’t see how it’s different than democracy

      • arthur@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Democracy and capitalism are not synonymous.

        And about capitalism, rich people (and by “rich”, I mean people that don’t need to work to stay rich and stay getting richer) have more access and influence on decision making them anybody else. Decision power should be spread more evenly, your society can have people delegated to take decisions, but that decisions should reflect the interest of the society as a whole, not only who gets economic power.

        • JohnDClay
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Democracy and capitalism are not synonymous.

          Agree, but are democracy and anarchy synonymous? The original post was taking about anarchical communism witch I thought was different than democratic socialism.

          • arthur@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            are democracy and anarchy synonymous?

            Idk enough of anarchy to answer that.

            I thought was different than democratic socialism.

            AFAIK they are different indeed