In the distant past, I used to be able to sit down at a bar where people would smoke, and not mind at all. Then came the smoking ban, which made me find it unpleasant, but not a big deal. Then came the lockdowns, and I got used to breathing super fresh air all the time. Now I start coughing if someone outdoors smokes 5m away from me and the wind blows it in my direction. Does this happen to anyone else or is it just me?

  • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I smoked for a while. It’s not the distance, it’s the wind. Most entryways have wind blocks that make it more comfortable to stand there and also make it easier to light a cigarette.

    While I completely understand that smoking is not a habit that passersby want to subject themselves to all the time, I do think some people are a little oversensitive about the sight of a smoker in a public outdoor place. The stuff that comes out of cars is equally if not more dangerous than second hand cigarette smoke in an outdoor area, but people tolerate it without complaint because they can acknowledge the universal utility of a car. Regardless of that utility though, it is still poisoning the earth and its inhabitants with every mile driven, and a cigarette is mostly only poisoning the smoker when used outdoors with reasonable distance from others.

    If we decided 6 feet is good enough for COVID, then it seems like 10 is more than enough for a cigatette.

    I know many will disagree with this—please be gentle.

    • root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah, the wind isn’t something I thought of. I grew up around 2 smokers (who still smoke decades later), and have always hated the smell, though I do appreciate when people tuck their cigs away when I walk by with my toddler. You bring up good points about the environment as well; I think it’s more of a personal annoyance being burdened with the smell. Similar to people who douse themselves in cologne XD

      • Vivia 🦆🍵🦀OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve seen conferences outright ban the use of scents because of people who get irritated by them. Fair enough, if you ask me.

    • Vivia 🦆🍵🦀OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In my case at least, it’s not a matter of seeing a smoker in a public place, the smell starts irritating my nose and throat and then I have to play a game of “find the smoker”. I agree that car exhausts are also harmful, I agree that we should also reduce driving as much as possible, but at least I can tolerate the smell of car exhaust much more easily if I have to be next to it. Everyone else seems to be able to enjoy their (outdoor) meal or concert, and I’d love to be able to get back to the point where I can think “yeah this is harmful, I should probably not subject myself to it” instead of “I can’t breathe”.

    • berkeleyblue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Regarding your car example: I agree, but as you said, cars have utility. Cigarettes don’t. They are a deadly concoction of carcinogenic substances that damage almost every organ in your body. And as you said, they are even unhealthy for bystanders. The fact that we haven’t outright banned them yet is beyond me… And that’s not to shit on Smokers, they are the primary victims of this disgusting industry that shows no signs of having a sense for morals.

      • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They unfortunately do have a usefulness for the smoker though—that’s why people get started. The advantages are subtle intoxication without impairment, socialization rituals, and built in excuses for a break. I work in healthcare and you’d be amazed how many nurses smoke, not because they’ve been fooled by the industry, but rather because they don’t have a better substitute for the benefits that smoking provides them during their stressful day.

        • berkeleyblue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, they smoke because they are addicted. Again I don’t blame them, they are the main victims. They most likely started smoking during adolescence, depending on their age because it was seen as cool, a sign of maturity, group pressure and so on. Add to that the Tabacco industry’s year long investement in marketing. First they paid some “Doctors” to promote their product, then they hooked themselves up with the Movie industry and most of their anti-smoking campaigns are inneffective or even deliver new customers as they are seen as beeing “responsible” (http://tiny.cc/dbf8vz). They added an Ammonium based compounds to Cigarettes that make them more addictive, basically the same principle thats used in crack (http://tiny.cc/9bf8vz), or sugar so that they taste better and you can inhale them easier

          By the time they feel the first adverse effects, their hooked and apmost 80% of Smokers who try to quit, fail to do so at one point. () And when 7 out of 10 Smokers say they do want to quit (http://tiny.cc/ibf8vz) you can hardly make the argument that they chose to smoke. They are addicted and don’t really have much if a choice anymore. And quitting is hard as hell. There are studies that suggest that it realistically needs about 30 attempts for the average person to successfully quit smoking (http://tiny.cc/kbf8vz).

          And when someone tries to sue them after people died because they used their product, got linger cancer and died, it’s aleays the same:

          It wasn’t OUR cigarettes who killed them. They knew the risk! Or they just draw it out so long that the people suing die or run out of money before they ever get a chance of justice.

          And nowadays, the came up with vaping. Something that’s at least equally addictive, but now tastes like bubble gum and cotton candy, and you are telling me that this is a responsible industr? That people smoke because there are so many benefits? I’d rather give people extra breaks instead of having them smoke. We as a society have a responsibility to protect those who fail to protect themselves. And a substance that’s inevitably killing it’s users at a rate that’s almost grotesque, is legal tobe consumed in public while some US states arrest your for HOLDING a liquor bottle, is absolute madness.

          Smoking kills 8 million people every single year. That’s 1 human every 4 seconds, 1.2 million of them die because of secondary smoke exposure. (http://tiny.cc/vbf8vz).

          Again, how can they be legal?

          Oh and regarding nurses or health personel in general: What they know professionaly and what they do privately are enormously different things. When the pandemic started here in Switzerland, a local Newspaper asked people in different fields if they would take a vaccine once we had one. Over 40% of people in the healtcare sector said no. That’s the second highest number. Only construction workers were less willing to take a shot with about 2% more.

          And when it comes to smoking, yes they smoke, but not because they think it’s healthy or they like it so much, not really. Most of them are addicted cause they started as kids and stopping is about as hard as stop using heroine or cocaine (see links above).