PugJesus@lemmy.dbzer0.com to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoWhat do you mean mechs are non-credible?lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square68fedilinkarrow-up1416arrow-down111
arrow-up1405arrow-down1imageWhat do you mean mechs are non-credible?lemmy.dbzer0.comPugJesus@lemmy.dbzer0.com to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square68fedilink
minus-squaredublet@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36arrow-down1·1 year agoAh but the bipedal mech suits could crawl along to floor, given a really low profile. Tank can’t do that. Checkmate. /s
minus-squareeestileiblinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 year agoI want to see a Raven crawling on the floor with a low profile. A Dire Wolf would be quite something too.
minus-squareNielsBohron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoDidn’t the original tabletop BT rules allow for mechs to lie prone for better accuracy and defense? And mechs that didn’t have arm actuators had a penalty to standing back up?
Ah but the bipedal mech suits could crawl along to floor, given a really low profile. Tank can’t do that. Checkmate.
/s
I want to see a Raven crawling on the floor with a low profile.
A Dire Wolf would be quite something too.
Didn’t the original tabletop BT rules allow for mechs to lie prone for better accuracy and defense? And mechs that didn’t have arm actuators had a penalty to standing back up?