National reparations commissions in the region will also approach Lloyd’s of London and the Church of England with demands of financial payments and reparative justice for their historic role in slavery.

  • JasSmith@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is getting silly now. We’ve agreed for thousands of years that children aren’t responsible for the sins of their fathers. This attempt to resurrect Babylonian era values is absurd. Critical thinking is clearly absent in modern schooling.

    • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      It has nothing to do with punishing children for the sins of their fathers, it’s about paying people for the work they did. Living descendants of slave owners still benefit today from the unpaid labour, to pay reparations isn’t a punishment, it’s the smallest possible attempt to make the victims of slavery whole.

      • JasSmith@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        it’s about paying people for the work they did.

        Okay, so pay slaves for the work they did. But we can’t, because they’re long dead. So that’s not what you’re asking at all. You’re asking for people who never owned slaves to pay people who were never slaves. Not all British white people are wealthy as a result of historical slavery. In fact, most British were dirt poor and never owned any slaves at all. Today, their ancestors remain dirt poor. You’d ask them to pay recompense for something for which neither they nor their ancestors are guilty.

        I’m white and of Irish descent. My ancestors were subject to genocide under the Irish Potato Famine. Am I morally owed restitution? Further back, my ancestors were subject to slavery along the North African coast and Middle East for hundreds of years in the Barbary slave trade. Am I owed reparations from the numerous countries involved in that? To me it quickly becomes apparent that any feigned moral outrage begins and stops at white people. Everyone’s ancestors are guilty of atrocities if we go back far enough. Everyone’s ancestors were subject to atrocities as well.

        • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          we can’t because they’re long dead

          If someone died today who was owed £100,000 for some work they did, would the debt be written off, or would it become owed to their estate?

          most British didn’t have slaves

          Did you forget what thread you were commenting on? This is about the royal family, not some random East Londoner from the 17th century.

          am I owed restitution

          I would say so, yes. But it’s not “moral”, this is nothing to do with morals, it’s to do with the reality of the situation - Irish people have historically been victimised for the benefit of others, especially the British, and so I would 100% be in favour of the UK making some sort of payment to try and mitigate that problem. I do have to say that, morally speaking, (but not technically) I think it’s lower on the priority list, because white Irish people have a pretty decent quality of life now, and imo it would be better to try put money where it would be most needed before paying overdue debts to more prosperous people

    • byroon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      The UK government was still paying off former slaveowners as recently as a few years ago

      • RobotToaster@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Paying off the loan they took out to compensate the slave owners for their “property” to be more precise.

        As repugnant as that was, it was still preferable to the terrible waste of life the USA endured fighting a civil war over slavery.

      • JasSmith@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes they made a financial commitment to various states, companies, and individuals to compensate slave owners for their financial loss when Britain ended the slave trade. I think that was pragmatic and commendable. I don’t see how that addresses me comment.

    • tegs_terry@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably not, and even then it’d be taxpayer money, which is totally unfair.

        • SmellyHamWallet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wasn’t Belgium one of the countries that had the biggest hand in slave trade? I remember reading they were horrific. Yet, they’re barely spoken about in the same sentence.

          • JasSmith@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s nothing. You should hear about what the Vikings did. And the Romans. And the Sumerians.

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              There’s a actual difference here in two ways. Firstly racialized transatlantic chattel slavery was a massive break from the slavery that had been practiced before in the form of those three adjectives. But also the European mainland suing Scandinavia for reparations, the entirety of Europe, Middle East, and North Africa suing Italy for reparations, and Iraq and Iran suing Iraq for reparations are materially different from some of the poorest countries in the world suing the royal family of a wealthy nation that still has an empire for reparations.

  • Lexam@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Royal family responded “But we already made reperations to the slave holders!”

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Earlier this year, the Guardian revealed that direct ancestors of King Charles III and the royal family bought and exploited enslaved people on tobacco plantations in Virginia.

    Research by the playwright Desirée Baptiste unearthed a document instructing a ship’s captain to deliver the enslaved Africans to Edward Porteus, a tobacco plantation owner in Virginia, and two other men.

    Support for the research was part of Charles’s process of deepening his understanding of “slavery’s enduring impact”, the spokesperson said, which had “continued with vigour and determination” since his accession.

    “It is part of our shared history that caused enormous suffering and continues to have a negative impact on Black and ethnically diverse communities today,” the company stated on its website.

    “There’s no doubt that those who were making the investment knew that the South Sea Company was trading in enslaved people, and that’s now a source of real shame for us, and for which we apologise,” Gareth Mostyn, chief executive of the Church Commissioners, told BBC radio earlier this year.

    Adrian Odle, a lawyer and commission chair, told the Telegraph that British institutions are compromised by their ancestral guilt, saying “every property that the royal family is in possession of has the scent of slavery”.


    The original article contains 638 words, the summary contains 204 words. Saved 68%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • rebul@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Inconvenient truth. Africans captured and sold other Africans to slave traders. The ‘white devils’ did not sneak into the African interior and steal them away, they waited for them to be brought to the coast. Still an awful practice, but the question has to be asked, “Why not demand reparations from modern day African nations?”

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      For one, modern day African nations are not a small group of ultra rich white assholes who are still benefitting from the slavery.

      It helps when the scope of the action is clear and direct and includes specific people.

      • rebul@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ahh, it’s what I thought. It’s not about truth and justice, it’s about shaking people down for money.

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you think fining people who have wronged others is ‘shaking people down for money’.

          • rebul@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Stupid comment. So, using your logic, it would be OK to fine you for something your great great great grandfather did. I’m confident that not a single ‘internet couch activist’ would accept that.

            • snooggums@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              If I had inherited insane wealthy due to the horrible actions of my ancestors, then losing part of it to repay the victims of that tragedy is perfectly fine. It isn’t like I earned it through my actions, and I would expect that if someone stole something from me and gave it to someone else then I should still get it back.

              Way to be selfish though, hope it lets you sleep at night.

              • rebul@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Very noble of you to state what you would do IF yada yada yada. I call BS.

          • JasSmith@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you only go after the people with money, then yes. Then it’s not about justice or morality at all. It’s about money.

    • G4Z@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Barbary pirates in North Africa actually came to South West England and took slaves.

      Still though, the barbary pirates don’t exist as an entity any more, the Royal family unfortunately does.

    • 0x815@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      What a garbage! I’m sorry, but how out of touch can one get?

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are you asking yourself how out of touch you are? Because you should.

  • G4Z@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not just the wealth overseas they stole, they stole from all of us as well.

    Abolish the monarchy, take it all back and pay us and the others their ancestors stole from our wealth and land back.