Obviously, this will probably never happen. In the best future for humanity, maybe we can drop our emissions enough to allow for such a thing. But more likely societal collapse

  • Kit Sorens@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    If we went carbon neutral today, things would continue to worsen for an estimated 50-70 years before correcting. Only going significantly carbon negative solutions will have the rapid, desired effect, and that’s nigh impossible.

    • mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      One of the Civilization 6 expansions introduces climate changes. You can unlock a technology for carbon recapture, however, generally by the time you are able to unlock it, climate change is already occurring. You’re also not able to reverse damage that has already been done.

      While it can be frustrating in game, I appreciate the fact that the developers realistically incorporated it not being feasible.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’ll be something like the tragedy of the Commons. People in jurisdictions that don’t enforce carbon neutral activities would just ramp their activities up with more abandoned, relying on the scrubbers to save them. And they’re definitely going to be able to outpace the scrubbers.

      In our current economic modeling, a carbon generating activity is a profit center, a carbon sinking activity would be a cost center. So every business would be incentivized to generate carbon and not sinking any of it. And it’d be difficult for governments to pay for sinking it. Especially when carbon can be produced outside their own jurisdiction.

  • BillDaCatt@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The bigger question is this: How much energy would be required to collect and sequester 101% of daily carbon emissions?

    I think it absolutely should be done, but getting there will be a huge undertaking and we will need creative solutions to get there without contributing to the problem.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    If this does happen, and there are strong carbon controls globally, we could potentially reverse global warming very very slowly. But it would trend to the better. I’m hopeful

  • krey
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator