• zib@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree in principle, but the government would take the money and allocate 99% of it to the military budget rather than do anything useful with it.

    • CountZero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, the government generally has a plan and definite budget for their money, which includes social programs and infrastructure. You can debate about how good it is, but at least it’s there.

      Giving money to a charity directly controlled by them (or their kids, or one of their billionaire friends) might just make that money disappear.