• saxysammyp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have read a few articles on this. Does anyone know what they mean by “universal”? That brings to mind the thought of the government offering a public option for ISPs, which I just don’t see Biden doing (I would love to be proven wrong).

    Or is this money just going to be given to corporate ISPs who will probably find a way to continue to jack up the price for the consumer all while being subsidized on their expansion?

    If the later is the case, are we just throwing around the word “universal” now?

    • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      “universal” here is meant as “everyone in America can buy it”, right now there are lots of places in rural America where high speed internet just isn’t available at any price (except for satellite, which has its own problems)

      Regarding your guess of what it is, it’s kind of even worse than that - this is far from the first initiative like this, and every time the ISPs just pocket the money, do barely any actual expansion, and call it a day.

      So at the end of the day, as a country we’ll probably wind up with unchanged (or worse) internet prices, more or less the same coverage in rural areas, and 42b poorer in tax revenue

      But hey, some ISP execs are probably going to get some fat bonuses, so we have that to be thankful for

      • imaqtpieA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yup, sounds about right. 42 billion to CEO pockets and our internet access remains subpar.