telling those living within a 50 mile (80km) radius of a Big Blue office to be at their desks at least three days a week
This feels a bit discriminatory, but also sort of an obvious solution for those who can move or pretend to have moved to their parents’ place, etc.
Big corporations still have major investments in real estate to justify to shareholders, and management at many companies prefer to see bums on seats – a phenomenon Microsoft previously termed productivity paranoia.
Happens incredible rarely, but I’m with Microsoft on this one.
In general I do see the point of mingling, especially during the probation period, when so many things are new. But the forceful, out-of-thin-air number of days in the office is daft. They could at least make it moving average over a quarter or two. Or a whole year.
Coming into a work location should make sense for what you’re trying to do, not to justify a building cost. I see too many CEOs simply follow what another CEO is doing even if they’re in a completely different industry.
That as well!
Friend got laid off a couple months ago from IBM with the sole reason because they were the only one on their team of 20 that didn’t live “near” an office.
Guess it makes sense now that they are going to force rto
The roundabout way like this really sucks.
