WASHINGTON—Shedding light on the enduring appeal behind assault rifle ownership, a Pew study released Monday revealed that more Americans were buying AR-15s to defend themselves from toddlers who found their guns. “Many Americans stressed that they felt safer knowing they had an AR-15 at the ready in case their toddler stumbled across a shoebox holding a loaded gun on the floor of a closet and started firing away,” said researcher Jonathan Lieu, noting that the majority of AR-15 owners told his team they purchased the lightweight rifle due to their recurring fears about waking in the night to their 2-year-old giggling as they shot bullet holes through the bedroom door. “One response we often heard was that it was a Second Amendment right for gun owners to defend themselves against their own young children. They also stressed that a baseball bat or pepper spray simply wasn’t enough firepower to take down their gun-toting kids.” Lieu added that many Americans also rushed out to purchase tear gas grenades after their children inevitably got their hands on the AR-15s.

  • Seraph@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No one can tell this is The Onion before the last 5 words, and even then your brain has to think twice.

    Best headline I’ve seen from them in a while!

    • Late2TheParty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I, 1000%, did a double-take on that headline. And, it took me way too long to figure out what community this was.

  • GreenMario@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only way to stop a bad toddler with a gun is a good adult with an even bigger gun.

  • Syrc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Silly Americans, just buy a Minigun! No way a toddler can operate a Minigun. I think.

  • Hyperreality@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have always found it a bit bizarre how some Americans will proudly advertise the fact they have loads of very expensive things in their house.

    If I had a gun collection, and I live in a rural area with a lot of hunters so I assume plenty of my (European) neighbours do, I’d keep it quiet.

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s because unfortunately, you only hear from the big mouths.

      A lot of gun owners are quiet. In my concealed carry classes, not a single person fit the stereotype or even spoke about our guns. We follow the “speak softly and carry a big stick” mantra

      • Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What I find weird is that there’s only one type of gun owner. There is only one archetype and 100% of gun owners are that archetype

    • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s also very bizarre that the party that wants guns to protect themselves from tyranny also want to give the government more and bigger weapons instead of, you know, making them weaker.

      That’s when you realize that these assholes are not about protecting themselves. It’s about oppression.

  • Reptorian@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it a bad thing that I thought this was real at first? Yeah, I think it is.

    • shadowSprite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I dont subscribe to this community, but sometimes when I switch to all I see it as I’m scrolling. I hate that damn near everytime it almost gets me before I notice which community it is. I read the post title and for just a second I’m like, that seems just a little too much even for the fearmonger sites to try to pull over, and then damn, the onion has gotten me again. The onion never used to get me. I hate our timeline.

    • orbitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I thought it was at least plausible from many headlines of the US sites, but I am Canadian so not from there plus it didn’t quite pass the smell test before I knew it was satire…after confirming the source site.

  • Yerbouti@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How stupid must you be to do that. Everybody knows that an AR-45 takes way too long to reload and can only hold 20 charges. You’re way better with a Beretta 46 pistol or even a Colt. You will shoot much faster and the 19mm bullets can easily penetrate their soft skull. Plus toddlers usually dont aim very well so you should be fine anyway.

    • sab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, just get them with a preemptive strike, the morons don’t even see it coming.