Oh, good. 🙁

  • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    it’s long been assumed twitter just kind of makes its metrics up, especially now that “views” are a thing you can “see” on regular tweets, so tough to say. what can be said: it did unambiguously reach a lot of people, but i doubt it was anywhere near 16m unique people

    • PTZ@lemmy.ptznetwork.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right, exactly. And that got me thinking: what counts as a view?

      Do you have to click play and watch it or does it count as a view if it shows up in your feed and you scroll past it? I’m leaning toward the latter, but I don’t have any knowledge of how Twitter’s metrics work (if there is even any logic to them, that is).

      I definitely agree that it wasn’t anywhere near 16m unique people, so I do feel a little better about our species. lol

      • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Do you have to click play and watch it or does it count as a view if it shows up in your feed and you scroll past it? I’m leaning toward the latter, but I don’t have any knowledge of how Twitter’s metrics work (if there is even any logic to them, that is).

        autoplay is another factor, since i know some twitter videos absolutely do that. they also repeat.

        I definitely agree that it wasn’t anywhere near 16m unique people, so I do feel a little better about our species. lol

        another thing to feel good about: tucker is a known quantity, so i doubt he’s reaching a lot of new people (and especially not on Twitter, where people are already likely to be quite set in ideology)