• AttackBunny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m kind of torn. Charging anyone sets bad precedent, but at the same time, if I rent a racetrack (like willow springs) I have to pay for corner workers, insurance, instructor, AND fire/rescue. If rich asshats want to go play, why aren’t they required the same thing? Since, you know, it’s likely shit is going to go wrong with experimental stuff.

    Also, expending as much manpower as they did, while immigrant boats capsize, and kill people regularly, seems disproportionally like an overreaction. While they typically throw their hands up and say, “oh a boat capsized, and we looked for an hour, but everyone’s dead, sucks” when immigrants die.

    • grte@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel you. I think at a bare minimum anyone wanting to do something like this should be required to get some sort of insurance coverage that will help bear the cost of rescue/recovery if the worst happens.

    • Kichae@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a… I don’t want to call it an “easy solution”, but there’s a pretty understandable and clear distinction that can be made here: If you’re offering a commercial service to people, and an investigation finds negligence on your part, the public should be able to sue to recoup at least some of the expenses.

    • socialjusticewizard
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think it’s all that slippery a slope. Not many deep sea private submarine rescue operations going on amidst the working class.

      • AttackBunny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it should apply to all the typically “rich guy” endeavors. Like all the space tourism that’s already happening.

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think there needs to be a limit. In (Inland) search and rescue for example, they will do all they can to get you out, but if you’re injured they aren’t calling an ambulance (unless you desire so) and they don’t cover the cost of any kind of healthcare.

      In this scenario, it would make sense to restrict or limit aid for non-millitary underwater recovery operations, especially those involving a submarine. The govt should not be bankrolling private companies’ experiments IMO unless there is a really good reason for it

      Edit: added type of SAR