- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
It’s interesting to me that she’s suggesting people are breaking the revenge porn law for content she freely uploaded online as a camgirl, doesn’t really seem like it fits.
It’s interesting to me that she’s suggesting people are breaking the revenge porn law for content she freely uploaded online as a camgirl, doesn’t really seem like it fits.
Her and her husband were consenting and making money. I fail to see how this relates to her campaign. Unlike others, who fund sex work with campaign money
deleted by creator
Well, they were consenting lol