• trailing9@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    With competition, other units will be cheaper. Units will be rented for production costs. Competition is not a bandaid but the solution.

    • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lmao you can’t be serious?! Where is this competition right now and why aren’t they completing currently competing?

      • trailing9@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are many obstacles like complex building codes, limited supply of building sites, credit requirements or limited public transport. Reduce them, respectively increase public transport, and more people have an opportunity to spend their money on real estate with the expectation of profits.

        • MyNameIsIgglePiggle
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Spending.money on real estate with the expectation of profits is the problem in all of this.

          Housing should not be an investment

          • trailing9@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Who should create real estate without profits?

            If you supply housing as a government service, construction workers will play the same games as defence contractors. Do you expect rent to be cheaper?

            What’s wrong with profits? They compensate for the risk and effort that comes with creating real estate. They are only too high when there is no competition.

            If profits are too high, what is preventing you from creating a new house and be rewarded with those profits? Change the world so that you, and thus others, have the ability to participate. Then housing prices will be fair.

            • MyNameIsIgglePiggle
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              No problem with builders making money.

              Why don’t I just erect an estate? Land is too expensive here, not the buildings. Very hard to make new land.

              • trailing9@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Land is expensive where many people live. There is enough land available in Alaska for estates

                Not everybody can live in an estate and expect low travel time into the city center.

                If you want to create new housing in a city, you have to share land. In other words, you have to build high-risers.

                • MyNameIsIgglePiggle
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  They want a million dollars (AUD) for 1000m2 of farmland where I am, 1 hour commute to the nearest city

                  It’s on a flood plane

                  It’s advertised to people to use as “land banking” on the off chance that it might get rezoned in the next 20 years.