• ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        A well balanced breakfast, being necessary to the start of a healthy day, the right of the people to keep and eat food shall not be infringed.

        In the above sentence, who has the right to keep and eat food, “the people,” or “a well balanced breakfast?”

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            So if you skip breakfast you don’t deserve the right to food? No lunch or dinner? Snacks ist verboten?

            It clearly says the right of the people to keep and eat food shall not be infringed. You know you’re wrong.

            • blazera@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              The hell is this weird strawman. Im not arguing against food im telling you how a sentence is written. As written, a balanced breakfast is the entire reason people have the right to food.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              You wrote a dumb shit sentence because the militia is the cause of the clause that follows in this stance, and in your example a breakfast is not the cause for keeping food but rather breakfast food.

              You made a bad example and declared it victory lol

              • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It’s not a bad example, it’s gramatically the exact same, and instead of admitting you’re wrong you’re choosing to stamp your feet like an obtuse child. You’re free to do so, but everyone else is free to read your shame.

                Edit: wait, different person. You’re choosing to stamp your feet on behalf of another* like an obtuse child, 'scuse me.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You’re posting in a public forum home slice.

                  If you’re intent on a private conversation, DMs are right there.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your right to bear arms is not infringed by specific controls.

      You have a right to freedom of religion but local codes still come into okay for sacrifices/burnt offerings/etc.