• unnecessarygoat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Communism focusses too much power in too few positions,

    marxism would be a better term instead of communism as true communism requires no one having economic or political power over someone else

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Marxism, and certainly marxism-leninism (stalinism) are so diluted by the bears of hex and the grads of lemmy.

      But Marx’ evaluation of the might of the kapital is important, the thing is to find a way to do politics without money or the loudest shouters.

    • Quacksalber
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would, but communism on a decently large scale needs someone to allocate resources. And that jon comes with a lot of power. Which brings us back to marxism.

      • kugel7c@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure why large scale decision making has to be deferred to a single person instead of a large group. Tbh that’s one of the main problems with current large companies. Why not conduct a fucking vote, not about who should make the decision, but about what decision is made.

    • Gorilladrums
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Communism is a part of Marxism. Communism is the utopia, aka the fantasy world, of Marxist ideology. It’ll never happen because perfection can never be achieved.