• SNEWSLEYPIES@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    On the contrary, I’m putting the goalposts back where they were before you misunderstood them.

    From the article:

    Hall concludes the companies have borrowed to pay dividends, rather than to invest in infrastructure projects. The £123bn of capital expenditure spent by the companies has all been financed by customer bills, the analysis states.

    • julietOscarEcho
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Read the thread you’re commenting on mate.

      Under no circumstances should a company be borrowing and paying dividends at the same time

      I have no objection to particular instances of imprudent dividend paying being criticised. I specifically rejected this absolute statement.