Lackner et al. show that individuals with an intermediate level of science knowledge tend to have overconfidence in their own knowledge and negative attitudes to science.
yes, what suggested I didn’t? Is there evidence in the abstract? is there a way to access more than the abstract without having some special credential? I can see charts in a sidebar but I can’t enlarge them
No I didn’t pay to read the article, that’s my point. I read the available portion (the abstract). Making me pay to read whether an abstract has compelling evidence or not is a garbage m9del, that’s my point
yes, what suggested I didn’t? Is there evidence in the abstract? is there a way to access more than the abstract without having some special credential? I can see charts in a sidebar but I can’t enlarge them
You comments suggested it, again, did you pay to read the article or you just read the abstract?
No I didn’t pay to read the article, that’s my point. I read the available portion (the abstract). Making me pay to read whether an abstract has compelling evidence or not is a garbage m9del, that’s my point
Well you said it has zero evidence, which implies you read it
Ah yes, I should be forced to pay yo see if things are true. This is a sustainable model…
Oh wait no it isn’t. Misinformation is at all time highs. Maybe scientists should study why?
My hypothesis: when things become expensive people improvise, this is true with Healthcare and education.