This is a fantastic initiative. Hopefully all parties subscribe to this.

It’s win win for all involved. Only power companies would be against this.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, but the power company typically buys it from you at roughly half the price they sell it for, so a system that is offsetting power used on the premises is far more cost effective than one on an empty house.

    There’s also transmission losses to consider.

    • The_Hideous_Orgalorg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Put in a larger battery if you are interested in using site produced solar at unlit hours.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why do you think we step up the voltage as far as 220 thousand volts? You can lose a maximum of 5% of the nominal supply voltage between the switchboard and the load inside a building, and 7% from the point of supply to the load.

        Transmission loss on low voltage is definitely not insignificant.