Sir Keir Starmer has promised to seek a major rewrite of Britain’s Brexit deal in 2025 if Labour win the next general election, saying he owes it to his children to rebuild relations with the EU.

Starmer told the Financial Times that he would put a closer trading relationship with Brussels and a new partnership with business at the heart of his efforts to bolster Britain’s economic growth.

Britain’s Trade and Cooperation Agreement with the EU, negotiated by former premier Boris Johnson, is due for review in 2025 and Starmer said he saw this as an “important” moment to reset relations.

“Almost everyone recognises the deal Johnson struck is not a good deal — it’s far too thin,” he said in an interview. “As we go into 2025 we will attempt to get a much better deal for the UK.”

It is far from clear whether the EU would wish to renegotiate the trade deal, which only came into force in 2021, particularly if it involved Britain selectively choosing only parts of the single market. Many in Brussels see the 2025 review as simply a tidying-up exercise. 

  • mindbleach
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jesus fucking Christ, years on and they’re still mumbling ‘a better deal’ instead of admitting it was total failure. No details. No broad goals. Just… better! Somehow. And that’s good enough for right-wing types, because they don’t really mean things when they make the mouth noises. Their guy says better, it must be so! Your guy says better, well, so what.

    • Syldon@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Education is a means to an end. The main point being you cannot just reverse Brexit. There are still plenty of idiots who believe it should stay. The only way to reverse this is to show people what they are getting for their money. Brexit will not be here in 10 years time.

      • Bernie Ecclestoned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There is no fucking chance the EU would let the UK back in within 10 years. They are sick and tired of the UK’s ‘negotiating’

                • Syldon@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  He has until very recently held the opinions of the whole of the EU. He is a highly credible source for what the EU thought process and what it wants. The whole agenda of the EU is to unite Europe by trade with a view to preventing future conflicts. Who in the EU has stated that the UK could not rejoin?

                  There will be hurdles to jump in the path back into the EU. There will be concessions made on both sides. I could easily see Greece holding out for the Elgin marbles and succeeding. Spain will attempt and fail to reintegrate Gibraltar. The EU will also have changed a lot by the time we rejoin. No one in the EU will have the same conditions that they have had in the past.

    • Bernie Ecclestoned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The TCA has a 5 year review process so there’s opportunity to improve on the very thin deal that was agreed at pace and with idiots in Downing Street

      The EU also offered reduced checks for food safety alignment, and musicians visas.

      There are plenty of areas to work on, especially now Labour has a leader who isn’t anti EU as well.

  • eestileib
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think the EU wants y’all back fella…

    • Chariotwheel@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The EU wants the UK back. We’re stronger together and the UK can bring much to the table if it’s not currently going bonkers.

      • eestileib
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, about that whole “not going bonkers” thing …

      • gedhrel@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        TBH the UK in the single market is a better outcome for the UK as well as the EU. It puts something like reins on our frequently out-of-control government and leaves one powerful neoliberal voice out of the shouting match.

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That would imply that it really was over-ready as opposed to uncooked random ingredients still sitting in fields in farms, probably in the EU.

  • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I voted Leave. This is fine.

    Successive governments chopping and changing our relationship with the EU is what I expect. Brexit is a process, not an event.

    • Treczoks@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      What on earth could the UK offer to the EU to even think of opening a re-negotiation phase? And if you believe that the UK can somehow “out-deal” the UK during that, remember that the negotiation skills are still with the EU.

      But you said you voted for desaster. You got it, be happy.

      • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, they literally renegotiated the Northern Ireland Protocol earlier this year. Or the “Windsor Framework” as it’s known.

        The whole point of negotiations is to create a situation that’s beneficial to both parties. It’s in both the UK’s and the EU’s interest.

    • TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty weird seeing British tourists disappear over the past few years. Used to run into them all the time.