The actor told an audience in London that AI was a “burning issue” for actors.

  • nxfsi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nobody complained about copyright when Microsoft had the only image ai in the game, only when the open source stable diffusion came out did they start screeching about how ai was “stealing their jobs”.

      • nxfsi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        32
        ·
        1 year ago

        So years of Microsoft’s advertising dalle did nothing to educate the public about how ai works but they’re suddenly all experts the week after stable diffusion comes out?

        • Enigma
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, they didn’t because I’ve literally never heard of it until your comment. And I understand that my experience is anecdotal, but I guarantee I’m not the only one, or even one of only a couple thousand. You severely overestimate how knowledgeable the general public is on AI. Most haven’t even heard of Chat GPT, and that’s in the news, let alone expecting everyone to be interested in it enough to actually educate themselves on it.

          Like you’re the only person in this thread that’s even mentioned Microsoft’s version, yet you think “the public” knows about it?

    • Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Uh no people definitely did. Mostly the people that actually knew how this shit worked. But even laypeople complained when it was just Dall-E and Midjourney.

    • ShadowRam@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      What are you talking about? When MS had the only image AI in the game, it was garbage and couldn’t do anything useful. Of course no one was threatened.

      But after researchers got their hands on nVidia 3000 series cards, and finally had access to hardware.

      More advanced research papers started spilling out, which has caused this crazy leap in AI tech.

      Now the image/audio AI is advanced enough to be useful, hence now the threats…

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        When MS had the only image AI in the game, it was garbage and couldn’t do anything useful.

        And yet it was still doing exactly the same thing that people are now going on about how “unethical” it is.

        Just goes to show that they don’t actually care how “unethical” it is until it actually poses a threat to their income. It’s about money, not about principle.

        • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is such a ridiculous argument it’s not even funny. You have absolutely no evidence to back up your deranged claim. Take your victim complex somewhere else.