The actor told an audience in London that AI was a “burning issue” for actors.

The actor told an audience in London that AI was a “burning issue” for actors.

    • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish
      42·
      1 year ago

      It’s not copyright infringement. You can’t copyright a style, which is basically what a voice amounts to.

      This is something new. It’s a way of taking something that we always thought of as belonging to a person, and using it without their permission.

      At the moment the closest thing is trademark infringement, assuming you could trademark your personal identity (which you can’t). The harms are basically the same, deliberately passing off something cheap or dodgy as if it was associated with a particular entity. Doesn’t matter if the entity is Stephen fry or Pepsi Max.

        • SCB@lemmy.worldEnglish
          53·
          1 year ago

          Reproducing the contents of those works as they have is

          This did not occur.

            • SCB@lemmy.worldEnglish
              53·
              1 year ago

              That’s not reproduction of content so isn’t a copyright violation. Not shouldn’t be. Literally right now is not.

              The whole reason people are so up in arms about this is that we do not currently have laws or even standards that accurately police this kind of thing.