• PugJesus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Slippery slope fallacy = “These only vaguely connected things will lead to one another.”

    Pipeline = “This community has considerable overlap with another community, and participation in one is likely to lead to participation in the other.”

  • Kichae@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    When the slope is actually slippery, and you don’t know what a fallacy is.

    • obosob@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      A lot of people seem to not understand what a fallacy is. They think that if something is fallacious then it is necessarily false, which ironically is a fallacy in and of itself (the fallacy fallacy). All that a fallacy is is an argument that does not logically follow from the starting axioms and the conclusion. Slippery slopes are predictions, sometimes accurate ones, but it does not necessarily follow that some of a thing leads to more of that thing, thus it is a fallacy.

      • Kichae@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, that’s the thing, though. It’s only a fallacy if it doesn’t follow logically.

        Not that it matters. Observed trends, such as radicalization pipelines, are not logical arguments, they’re… observed trends. And suggesting that noticing those trends is actually engaging in a logical fallacy, as we see on display here, is just some bad faith cargo-cult no-you-ing.

    • darcyOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      its only slippery when its someone else slipping…