Starfields is one of the biggest games of 2023 – but it’s joined other recent games like Baldurs Gate 3 in being boycotted by conservatives because of the way it interacts with gender.

  • xkforce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Oh no… the biggest assholes in the universe are threatening to avoid these games… whatever will we do? Who is going to call people racial slurs over multiplayer now?

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah Ok, but there are message boards and mod communities and social media. Anytime bigots voluntarily remove themselves from the conversation is a win.

          • Zahille7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Saw some steam discussions about Homefront: The Revolution (was only interested in it for the TimeSplitters 2 rom in the game) about how people think this is exactly how China will invade the US. I’m sitting here like “…no.”

      • Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        For now. It’s possible it can go multiplayer though like Skyrim and Morrowind through 3rd party apps/mods. I currently host a for fun pop up multiplayer Morrowind server using tes3mp. Skyrim has a similar 4 person co-op mod.

  • kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh no! Developers will have to choose between catering to bigots and catering to literally everyone else! What ever will they do?!?

    Seriously, I hope bigots continue to just remove themselves from all aspects of society.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If the bigots would remove themselves from the voting booth that would be awesome. Is there some way we can link voting to being open minded?

  • CyanFen@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I went to a comedy show in a somewhat “progressive” red area last night and the comic made a joke about pronouns (not in a negative light) but as soon as he mentioned pronouns pretty much the whole audience started booing at pronouns. It was pretty sad to see.

    I genuinely cannot understand why anyone gets hot and bothered over pronouns. It’s crazy. They’re crazy people.

    • WHYAREWEALLCAPS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because rather than have empathy for others and realize how their actions might affect others, they’d rather focus solely on themselves and make everything about them and how they’re inconvenienced.

      • PupBiru@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        it’d make some amount of sense if they were actually inconvenienced but i’m still not understanding the inconvenience tbh

    • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because the american education system failed them and they don’t even know what pronouns are, they just know that someone told them that they have to hate it with a passion.

    • Spacemanspliff@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They can’t understand it and their brains are small enough that not being able to understand something makes them mad.

    • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Subscribe to some conservative YouTube channels or Instagram accounts. Pronouns, LGBTQ, racec etc. are brought up and criticized CONSTANTLY.

    • Kichae@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’d think so, but weirdly enough, conservative “boycotting” more often than not seems to include buying and engaging with the things they claim they’re not using.

      • Endorkend@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Conservatives boycotting means they’ll buy something they wouldn’t buy otherwise and then bitch about it.

        It’s bizarre.

        Like with the Budd thing a while back, sure, they do in fact normally do buy some Budd, but when they got their panties in a bunch over the LGBTQ stance Budd took, they bought truckloads of it, to then destroy it. They still bought a shitload more Budd than they normally would.

        It’s bizarre.

        But in line with the rest of their behavior, since everything they do and say these days is completely unhinged.

  • Norgur@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They deliberately make their world a darker place and then complain about how dark the world is.

    • Endorkend@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s their universal shtick.

      Like, complain about the economy, then when they are in power, ruin the economy.

  • Endorkend@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was looking at the Steam forums for Starfield earlier after googling some quest I was on.

    Dear lord are they out in force.

    And the twists and turns they are making to explain why they think the pronouns should be removed from the game without saying it’s because they are easily triggered right wing fucklets is almost impressive.

    And as expected, quite a few phrased as “as a libtard, even I think this should be removed for xyz retarded reason”.

    And as we all know, any post that starts with “as a POC/WAMAN/RATIONAL PERSON” means some MAGAt jackass trying to be clever.

    • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would be so funny if someone made a genuinely fantastic video game, and it starts with picking a gender and all, and then the first cutschene is that person transitioning. It doesn’t matter for the plot and never comes up again in the game, because he or she is now just that. Can you imagine how they would freak the fuck out? I saw that other cunt’s artery explode because there was a screen in starfield that asks you for your gender and you had more than two options.

  • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    They already gave up a few days after release when the initial troll rush got bored. They usually aren’t the ones actually playing the game, they’re absolute loser fragile snowflakes.

  • DrPop@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d it wasn’t a problem in call of duty shoot a man when Richard Nixon respected our pronouns it isn’t an issue now. They just hate whatever they’re told to.

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sci-fi and Horror two genres that really aren’t know for their conservative values and the media often pushes social norms. Not sure what they were exspecting

    • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes, but, a lot of the capital-g Gamers are reactionary howler monkeys who can not handle anything not specifically geared towards cis, straight white men, so I’m not surprised they lost their shit at a menu option.

    • Chariotwheel@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Horror two genres that really aren’t know for their conservative values a

      Objection. It’s obviously a huge genre, but there is certainly conservatism to be found there. I point to the xenophobia of Lovecraft as an example and the tropes of teenager slashers where “slutty” women die and “pure” women live, and Black people tend to not live long.

        • Ferk@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Other-phobic

          Honestly, the “cosmic horror” or the mere fear of the unknown kind of plays into that as well.

          One could argue there’s something inherently racist in sci-fi horror that depicts aliens as monsters when in fact they might just simply be different intelligent lifeforms with their own set of needs…

          There might be sometimes problems among intelligent lifeforms to properly understand / communicate, or conflicts in our goals. But painting everything alien/unknown as inherently scary is kind of racist, even if in some situations it might be written in our instincts to not trust that which is unfamiliar.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            TOS Star Trek had a great episode called Devil in the Dark dealing with that subject, where an inhuman monster is killing miners and it turns out that it was an intelligent life form that was protecting its eggs.

            • Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah maybe my mind is getting muddled with age but I vaguely remember several sci Fi settings with that kind of “from a certain perspective” moments in the 80s/90s. The matrix backstory is another just replace aliens with robots. Hell mars attacks though the late 90s early 2000s kinda flips that on its head by having several scenes where humans think they’re just misunderstanding the martians diplomacy and the martians having 0 interest in diplomacy.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think in most of them, the aliens were basically anthropomorphic. The only one I can think of off the top of my head that’s similar to Devil in the Dark is the movie Monsters (which I personally did not like), where the aliens were viewed as a threat, but they actually just didn’t care about humans.

          • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I wasn’t even talking about his horror, to be honest. The man himself was a hot mess of being afraid of everyone different. As well as being oddly picky about who he applied it to - he was extremely antisemitic but married a Jewish woman. He hated gay people but one of his best friends was gay. It was like he hated the idea of Others but was ok with an very few individuals on a very personal level.

            As for what you’ve brought up, that’s often, I think, why SF can be used to explore racism or themes of racism. By making a complete alien The Other, you can look at and explore ideas that would nowadays get folks screaming “WOKE!!!” if you tried to explore it with races of people.

            • Ferk@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yes, his relationship with the idea of “Others” is strange… like a love/hate relationship. In fact, the cat which you mentioned (named after a racial slur, though it seems it was not him who named it) was deeply loved by him… he using his cat’s name in one of his works was more of a way to honor it rather than anything else, there’s letters from him claiming he was still mourning even though it was more than 20 years since it vanished.

            • HipPriest@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              A lot of people can hold low key prejudices against the abstract notion of a group of people but make exceptions for people that they actually know, it’s really weird but that’s humans for you…

              • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Only Lovecraft wasn’t low-key at all. Dude was high-key, so much that people in his own time were saying he was racist. I mean, there’s a Hitler or Lovecraft quiz out there.

                Lovecraft had very complex thinking about race, oddly enough. He was ok with his Jewish wife because she was “assimilated enough” because at the time he thought assimilation was best. Later, he went against that and thought non-whites should keep their own cultures (but those cultures were inferior) and praised groups trying to do so, and looked down on anyone not Anglo-Saxon. Dude was a paradox and how.

                • HipPriest@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Hey cool that’s by Zoe Quinn!

                  Point taken though - didn’t do the whole thing but more then a few I thought were Hitler turned out to be Lovecraft. Never actually read any of his books. (Lovecraft’s that is. Well Hitler’s either thinking about it…)

      • squiblet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s also that old slasher trope where teenagers making out in a car = they’re about to get murdered by the monster or serial killer.