CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org to Artificial Intelligence - Ethics | Law | Philsophy@lemmy.intai.techEnglish · 1 year agoA test of artificial intelligence - Naturewww.nature.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down10
arrow-up13arrow-down1external-linkA test of artificial intelligence - Naturewww.nature.comCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org to Artificial Intelligence - Ethics | Law | Philsophy@lemmy.intai.techEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orgOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoIs that you’re opinion, or are you actually drawing from the article?
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orgOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoIn your opinion. In response to the one you just deleted: It’s not marketing, Nature is a scientific journal, and this is a review of approaches to measuring the presence or absence of such intelligence.
minus-squareDodecahedron DecemberlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoThat’s why I deleted it, bucko. Wrong person. Unrelated. It’s not my opinion, it’s fact. Spellcheckers and LLMs are not new. I’ve built a few of them. It isn’t intelligence. That’s not refutable.
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orgOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 year agoSpellcheckers are not LLMs. If you’ve built both, you should know that.
Is that you’re opinion, or are you actually drawing from the article?
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
It’s fact.
In your opinion.
In response to the one you just deleted: It’s not marketing, Nature is a scientific journal, and this is a review of approaches to measuring the presence or absence of such intelligence.
That’s why I deleted it, bucko. Wrong person. Unrelated.
It’s not my opinion, it’s fact. Spellcheckers and LLMs are not new. I’ve built a few of them. It isn’t intelligence. That’s not refutable.
Spellcheckers are not LLMs. If you’ve built both, you should know that.