Jason Novinger@programming.dev to Texas@lemmy.world · 1 年前Texas teacher fired for reading Diary of Anne Frank to class.www.chron.comexternal-linkmessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up1614arrow-down118cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1596arrow-down1external-linkTexas teacher fired for reading Diary of Anne Frank to class.www.chron.comJason Novinger@programming.dev to Texas@lemmy.world · 1 年前message-square50fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareImplyingImplications@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up40·1 年前I found a pdf online. This is the most graphic part of the book. This is what scares Texans.
minus-squareWahots@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up35arrow-down1·1 年前She is fairly scientific in her descriptions. Doesn’t seem like a problem to me. Any health class should be covering this anyways.
minus-squaresamus12345@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down2·1 年前She would have been mortified to know that this was going to be published for all the world to see in the future!
minus-squareteruma@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 年前Didn’t her father previously withhold these pages, and didn’t allow them to be published until later?
minus-squaresamus12345@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·1 年前I looked it up and it looks like you’re correct, this wasn’t published until 1995. Which explains why I’d never seen it before.
minus-squareabbotsbury@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 年前Are there any ways to tell if a version is abridged or not?
I found a pdf online. This is the most graphic part of the book. This is what scares Texans.![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/56edfc73-a261-4bd5-86ab-e85e2a1fdca2.jpeg)
She is fairly scientific in her descriptions. Doesn’t seem like a problem to me. Any health class should be covering this anyways.
You know they’re not in Texas…
She would have been mortified to know that this was going to be published for all the world to see in the future!
Didn’t her father previously withhold these pages, and didn’t allow them to be published until later?
I looked it up and it looks like you’re correct, this wasn’t published until 1995. Which explains why I’d never seen it before.
I didn’t realize it was that much later
Are there any ways to tell if a version is abridged or not?